In a recent blog interview, Braham Shnider from Channel Enablers makes some good points as to why running the channel is harder than direct selling —and from my
own experience I couldn’t agree more.
I’ve personally run direct sales, channel sales, and combinations of the two. With direct sales, I controlled the resources and could hire, fire, promote and most importantly, compensate as needed. In addition, I had real-time data on how we were performing in every region and could make timely adjustments as needed (add coverage, change resources, redeploy, etc.). Finally, I could put significant pressure on the reps to deliver at quarter-end. Unfortunately, the channel just didn’t share the same sense of urgency.
But running the channel doesn’t have to be more difficult. As more timely and accurate data has become available, channel managers are now finding they can address some of the same challenges faced by their direct sales peers.
Performance-based incentive programs are one of the keys to establishing more of a “direct sales” driven approach. Another approach is peer rankings. Ranking partners based on their performance vs. an unnamed peer group is a powerful motivator—just as comparing a sales reps performance to their peers is critical to getting the most out of a sales team. Timely scorecards, containing metrics such as actual performance vs. peer averages and year-over-year growth vs. peers, used as part of a periodic partner performance review can significantly influence performance—just as performance ranking does for direct sales.
Future posts will discuss more examples of direct-selling best practices being applied to the channel.

